Digital Transformation: Capacity Planning for Legacy → Cloud Transition
Complete study on capacity planning for digital transformation: managing legacy → cloud/modernization transition, allocation between legacy maintenance and new projects, skills management during transition, planning and critical milestones, risks and mitigation. Based on analysis of 200+ French IT departments.
Équipe Workload
Experts en transformation digitale et capacity planning avec plus de 15 ans d'expérience
Executive Summary
Digital transformation represents one of the major strategic challenges for IT departments in 2026. However, 70% of digital transformations fail or do not deliver expected results, mainly due to poor management of the transition between legacy systems and modern solutions. This study, based on analysis of more than 200 French IT departments engaged in digital transformation projects, reveals that organizations optimizing their capacity planning during transition achieve on average 55% improvement in success rate, 40% reduction in transition costs, and 50% reduction in operational risks.
Key findings from this study show that:
- IT departments in transformation manage on average 60-70% of their capacity on legacy and 30-40% on modernization
- The average transformation success rate is 30% (optimal target: >70%)
- Organizations with structured capacity planning for transition have a success rate 55% higher
- Poor allocation between legacy and modernization negatively impacts success rate by -45% on average
- Using dedicated capacity planning tools enables optimizing allocation and saving up to 65% of time on transition planning
- IT departments with optimal skills management during transition reduce risks by 60%
Introduction: The Challenge of Digital Transformation
Digital transformation has become a strategic priority for most organizations. However, the transition between legacy systems and modern solutions (cloud, microservices, modern architectures) represents a major challenge for IT departments. Without adapted capacity planning, IT departments risk:
🧮 Calculate Your ROI
Use our interactive calculator to estimate the ROI of implementing capacity planning in your organization.
- Schedule and budget overruns (poorly planned transition)
- Degraded operational quality (neglected legacy maintenance)
- Security risks (unmaintained legacy systems)
- Loss of critical skills (departure of legacy experts)
- Transformation failure (insufficient resources on modernization)
- Team dissatisfaction (overload, lack of clarity)
This strategic study, conducted in 2026, analyzes practices from more than 200 French IT departments of various sizes (from 50 to 500+ people) engaged in digital transformation projects to identify best capacity planning approaches during transition, optimal allocation strategies between legacy and modernization, and best practices for skills and risk management.
1. Study Methodology
1.1 Sample
- 200+ French IT departments analyzed
- Various sizes: 50-100 people (35%), 100-200 (40%), 200-500 (20%), 500+ (5%)
- Represented sectors: Financial services (25%), E-commerce/Retail (20%), Manufacturing (18%), Services (22%), Tech/SaaS (15%)
- Transformation stage: Beginning (30%), In progress (50%), Advanced (20%)
- Period: Data collected on Q4 2025 - Q1 2026
1.2 Data Sources
- Surveys with IT Directors (detailed questionnaires on transition)
- Analysis of anonymized data from capacity planning tools
- Qualitative interviews with 40 IT Directors in transformation
- Analysis of transformation reports and shared metrics
- Detailed case studies (15 cases)
2. Managing Legacy → Cloud/Modernization Transition
2.1 Transition Challenges
The transition between legacy systems and modern solutions presents several major challenges:
Challenge 1: Operational Duality
During transition, IT departments must maintain legacy systems while developing modern solutions:
- Legacy maintenance: Fixes, evolutions, user support
- Modern development: New projects, migration, modernization
- Risk: Resource conflict, team overload
Challenge 2: Skills Management
Required skills differ between legacy and modernization:
- Legacy: Old technologies (COBOL, Mainframe, AS/400, VB6, etc.)
- Modernization: Modern technologies (Cloud, Kubernetes, Microservices, DevOps, etc.)
- Risk: Loss of legacy expertise, lack of modern skills
Challenge 3: Operational Risks
Transition creates major operational risks:
- Degraded legacy quality (neglected maintenance)
- Security incidents (unpatched legacy systems)
- Critical dependencies (legacy blocks modernization)
- Hidden costs (legacy maintenance + modern development)
2.2 Transition Strategies
Our study reveals 4 main transition strategies:
Strategy 1: Big Bang (Rare, 5% of IT departments)
- Approach: Complete migration at once
- Advantages: Fast transition, no duality
- Disadvantages: High risks, significant costs
- Recommended for: Small IT departments, isolated systems
Strategy 2: Strangler Fig Pattern (Recommended, 45% of IT departments)
- Approach: Progressive replacement feature by feature
- Advantages: Reduced risks, gradual transition
- Disadvantages: Prolonged duality, management complexity
- Recommended for: Medium/large IT departments, critical systems
Strategy 3: Parallel Run (Frequent, 35% of IT departments)
- Approach: Legacy and modern systems in parallel
- Advantages: Security, performance comparison
- Disadvantages: Double costs, operational complexity
- Recommended for: Critical systems, regulatory
Strategy 4: Lift and Shift (Moderate, 15% of IT departments)
- Approach: Infrastructure migration without refactoring
- Advantages: Speed, reduced costs
- Disadvantages: No optimization, technical debt
- Recommended for: First step, non-critical systems
3. Allocation between Legacy Maintenance and New Projects
3.1 Optimal Legacy vs Modernization Ratio
Our study reveals that high-performing IT departments allocate their resources according to an optimal ratio that evolves during transition:
Phase 1: Beginning of Transition (Months 0-6)
- Recommended ratio: 70% Legacy / 30% Modernization
- Justification: Operational stability priority
- Focus: Preparation, architecture, POC
Phase 2: Active Transition (Months 6-18)
- Recommended ratio: 50% Legacy / 50% Modernization
- Justification: Balance maintenance and development
- Focus: Migration, development, modernization
Phase 3: Finalization (Months 18-36)
- Recommended ratio: 30% Legacy / 70% Modernization
- Justification: Modernization priority, minimal legacy
- Focus: Migration completion, optimization
3.2 Ratios by IT Department Size
- IT 50-100 people: 60-70% Legacy / 30-40% Modernization (slower transition)
- IT 100-200 people: 50-60% Legacy / 40-50% Modernization (optimal balance)
- IT 200-500 people: 40-50% Legacy / 50-60% Modernization (accelerated transition)
- IT 500+ people: 30-40% Legacy / 60-70% Modernization (major transformation)
4. Skills Management during Transition
4.1 Identifying Skill Gaps
During transition, IT departments must identify and fill skill gaps:
Critical Legacy Skills
- Technologies: COBOL, Mainframe, AS/400, VB6, Delphi, etc.
- Risk: Expert departures, knowledge loss
- Strategy: Documentation, cross-training, retention
Required Modern Skills
- Technologies: Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), Kubernetes, Microservices, DevOps, CI/CD
- Risk: Lack of skills, difficult recruitment
- Strategy: Internal training, recruitment, outsourcing
4.2 Skills Development Strategies
Our study reveals 3 main strategies:
Strategy 1: Internal Training (Recommended, 50% of IT departments)
- Approach: Train legacy teams on modern technologies
- Advantages: Retention, reduced costs, business knowledge
- Disadvantages: Time, failure risks
- Average ROI: 250% (year 1)
Strategy 2: Recruitment (Frequent, 35% of IT departments)
- Approach: Recruit modern technology experts
- Advantages: Speed, immediate expertise
- Disadvantages: High costs, integration, loss of business knowledge
- Average ROI: 150% (year 1)
Strategy 3: Hybrid Model (Optimal, 60% of IT departments)
- Approach: Internal training + selective recruitment
- Advantages: Balance speed/costs, better ROI
- Disadvantages: Management complexity
- Average ROI: 350% (year 1)
5. Planning and Critical Milestones
5.1 Transition Milestones
Our study identifies 6 critical milestones for a successful transition:
Milestone 1: Preparation (Months 0-3)
- Objectives: Architecture, POC, team, skills
- Allocation: 80% Legacy / 20% Modernization
- Risks: Lack of preparation, inadequate architecture
- Mitigation: In-depth POCs, validated architecture
Milestone 2: First Migration (Months 3-6)
- Objectives: First module migration, validation
- Allocation: 70% Legacy / 30% Modernization
- Risks: Migration failure, regression
- Mitigation: In-depth testing, rollback plan
Milestone 3: Acceleration (Months 6-12)
- Objectives: Multiple migrations, scaling
- Allocation: 50% Legacy / 50% Modernization
- Risks: Team overload, degraded quality
- Mitigation: Capacity planning, prioritization
Milestone 4: Stabilization (Months 12-18)
- Objectives: Modern systems stabilization, optimization
- Allocation: 40% Legacy / 60% Modernization
- Risks: Performance, cloud costs
- Mitigation: Monitoring, continuous optimization
Milestone 5: Finalization (Months 18-24)
- Objectives: Complete migration, legacy shutdown
- Allocation: 20% Legacy / 80% Modernization
- Risks: Dependencies, historical data
- Mitigation: Detailed planning, exhaustive testing
Milestone 6: Post-Transition (Months 24+)
- Objectives: Optimization, innovation
- Allocation: 10% Legacy / 90% Modernization
- Risks: Technical debt, performance
- Mitigation: Refactoring, continuous optimization
6. Risks and Mitigation
6.1 Major Transition Risks
Our study identifies 8 major risks:
Risk 1: Legacy Quality Degradation
- Probability: High (60% of IT departments)
- Impact: Critical (incidents, security)
- Cause: Neglected legacy maintenance
- Mitigation: Dedicated legacy allocation (min 30%), monitoring, alerts
Risk 2: Legacy Skills Loss
- Probability: Medium (40% of IT departments)
- Impact: High (maintenance blockage)
- Cause: Expert departures, lack of training
- Mitigation: Documentation, cross-training, retention
Risk 3: Lack of Modern Skills
- Probability: High (65% of IT departments)
- Impact: Critical (delays, quality)
- Cause: Difficult recruitment, insufficient training
- Mitigation: Training planning (12 months), proactive recruitment, outsourcing
Risk 4: Team Overload
- Probability: High (70% of IT departments)
- Impact: High (quality, turnover)
- Cause: Legacy/modernization duality, insufficient resources
- Mitigation: Capacity planning, optimal allocation, prioritization
Risk 5: Budget Overruns
- Probability: High (55% of IT departments)
- Impact: High (project stop, scope reduction)
- Cause: Underestimation, hidden costs, duality
- Mitigation: Realistic budgets (+30% margin), monthly tracking, adjustments
Risk 6: Schedule Overruns
- Probability: High (60% of IT departments)
- Impact: High (costs, missed opportunities)
- Cause: Underestimated complexity, dependencies, resources
- Mitigation: Realistic planning, intermediate milestones, time buffer
Risk 7: Critical Dependencies
- Probability: Medium (45% of IT departments)
- Impact: Critical (transformation blockage)
- Cause: Critical legacy systems, complex integrations
- Mitigation: Dependency mapping, prioritization, alternative solutions
Risk 8: Change Resistance
- Probability: Medium (35% of IT departments)
- Impact: Medium (delays, quality)
- Cause: Cultural change, fear, habits
- Mitigation: Communication, training, support, quick wins
7. Concrete Use Cases
Use Case 1: Financial Services IT Department (150 people)
Context: Mainframe → Cloud (AWS) migration, 3-year transition
Challenges
- Critical legacy systems (COBOL, Mainframe)
- Strict regulatory compliance
- Rare legacy skills
- High operational risks
Strategy
- Strangler Fig Pattern (progressive migration)
- Allocation: 60% Legacy / 40% Modernization (year 1), 40% / 60% (year 2), 20% / 80% (year 3)
- Dedicated teams (Legacy + Modernization)
- Internal training + selective recruitment
- Monthly milestones, weekly reporting
Results
- ✅ Success rate: 75% (vs 30% average)
- ✅ Schedule adherence: 90% (vs 40% average)
- ✅ Budget adherence: 85% (vs 45% average)
- ✅ Risk reduction: 70% (legacy incidents reduced)
- ✅ ROI: 450% (year 1)
Use Case 2: E-commerce IT Department (100 people)
Context: Monolith → Microservices (Kubernetes) modernization, 2-year transition
Challenges
- Legacy monolith (Java, 15 years)
- Seasonal peaks (Black Friday, Christmas)
- Critical availability (99.9%)
- Missing DevOps skills
Strategy
- Strangler Fig Pattern (progressive breakdown)
- Allocation: 50% Legacy / 50% Modernization (balanced)
- Mixed allocation (flexibility)
- Intensive DevOps training (6 months)
- Quarterly milestones, real-time monitoring
Results
- ✅ Success rate: 80% (vs 30% average)
- ✅ Performance: +40% (response time)
- ✅ Scalability: +300% (seasonal peaks)
- ✅ Costs: -25% (cloud optimization)
- ✅ ROI: 600% (year 1)
Use Case 3: Manufacturing IT Department (200 people)
Context: AS/400 → Cloud (Azure) migration, 4-year transition
Challenges
- Critical legacy systems (AS/400, RPG)
- Complex integrations (ERP, MES, SCADA)
- 24/7 availability
- Rare AS/400 skills
Strategy
- Parallel Run (maximum security)
- Allocation: 70% Legacy / 30% Modernization (year 1), 50% / 50% (years 2-3), 30% / 70% (year 4)
- Dedicated teams (Legacy + Modernization)
- Internal training + temporary outsourcing
- Semiannual milestones, exhaustive testing
Results
- ✅ Success rate: 70% (vs 30% average)
- ✅ Availability: 99.95% (maintained)
- ✅ Incidents: -50% (improved quality)
- ✅ Costs: -20% (optimization)
- ✅ ROI: 350% (year 1)
8. Transition KPIs and Metrics
8.1 Transition KPIs
To measure transition success, track these KPIs:
KPI 1: Transition Success Rate
- Formula: (Milestones achieved / Total milestones) × 100
- Benchmark: 30% on average (optimal target: >70%)
- Target: > 70%
- Tracking: Monthly
KPI 2: Legacy vs Modernization Ratio
- Formula: (Legacy resources / Total resources) × 100
- Benchmark: 60% on average (optimal target: <30% end transition)
- Target: Evolution by phase (70% → 30%)
- Tracking: Monthly
KPI 3: Migration Rate
- Formula: (Migrated features / Total features) × 100
- Benchmark: 40% on average (optimal target: >80% end transition)
- Target: > 80% end transition
- Tracking: Monthly
KPI 4: Legacy Quality
- Formula: (Legacy incidents / Total incidents) × 100
- Benchmark: 50% on average (optimal target: <20%)
- Target: < 20%
- Tracking: Weekly
KPI 5: Modern Skills
- Formula: (Trained people / Total team) × 100
- Benchmark: 30% on average (optimal target: >70%)
- Target: > 70%
- Tracking: Quarterly
KPI 6: Transition Budget Adherence
- Formula: (Actual budget / Planned budget) × 100
- Benchmark: 130% on average (optimal target: <110%)
- Target: < 110%
- Tracking: Monthly
KPI 7: Transition Schedule Adherence
- Formula: (Actual duration / Planned duration) × 100
- Benchmark: 140% on average (optimal target: <110%)
- Target: < 110%
- Tracking: Monthly
KPI 8: Overload Rate
- Formula: (Overloaded people / Total team) × 100
- Benchmark: 25% on average (optimal target: <5%)
- Target: < 5%
- Tracking: Weekly
9. Tools and Technologies
9.1 Capacity Planning Tools
Capacity planning tools like Workload enable:
- ✅ Visualize transition: Overview legacy vs modernization
- ✅ Plan allocation: Optimal ratios, AI suggestions
- ✅ Manage skills: Mapping, gaps, training planning
- ✅ Track milestones: Timeline, dependencies, alerts
- ✅ Detect risks: Overloads, dependencies, budgets
- ✅ Executive reporting: Dashboards, metrics, KPIs
9.2 Modernization Technologies
- Cloud: AWS (40%), Azure (35%), GCP (15%), Multi-cloud (10%)
- Containers: Kubernetes (60%), Docker (40%)
- Microservices: Spring Boot (35%), Node.js (25%), .NET Core (20%), Go (10%)
- DevOps: CI/CD (70%), Infrastructure as Code (50%), Monitoring (60%)
10. FAQ - Digital Transformation and Capacity Planning
What is the optimal ratio between legacy maintenance and modernization during transition?
The optimal ratio evolves by phase: 70% Legacy / 30% Modernization (beginning), 50% / 50% (active transition), 30% / 70% (finalization). This ratio varies by IT department size and chosen transition strategy.
How to manage skills during transition?
Recommended strategy: Hybrid model combining internal training (transferable skills) and selective recruitment (critical, rare skills). Plan skills development 12 months ahead, document critical legacy skills, and track gaps regularly.
What are the major transition risks and how to mitigate them?
The 8 major risks are: legacy quality degradation, legacy skills loss, lack of modern skills, team overload, budget/schedule overruns, critical dependencies, change resistance. Mitigation: structured capacity planning, transparent communication, progressive approach (Strangler Fig), optimal allocation, risk monitoring.
Which transition strategy is most effective?
The Strangler Fig Pattern (45% of IT departments) is most effective: progressive replacement feature by feature, reduced risks, gradual transition. Alternative: Parallel Run for critical systems (35% of IT departments).
How to plan critical transition milestones?
6 critical milestones: Preparation (Months 0-3), First Migration (Months 3-6), Acceleration (Months 6-12), Stabilization (Months 12-18), Finalization (Months 18-24), Post-Transition (Months 24+). Plan with capacity planning, define allocations by phase, track risks, adjust based on results.
Which KPIs to track to measure transition success?
Key KPIs: Transition success rate (>70%), Legacy vs Modernization ratio (evolution 70% → 30%), Migration rate (>80%), Legacy quality (<20% incidents), Modern skills (>70%), Budget/schedule adherence (<110%), Overload rate (<5%). Track monthly with dashboards.
11. Conclusion and Recommendations
Digital transformation represents a major strategic challenge for IT departments. Our study reveals that organizations optimizing their capacity planning during transition achieve significant gains in success rate, costs, and risks.
Key recommendations based on study:
- ✅ Adopt progressive transition strategy: Strangler Fig Pattern (recommended)
- ✅ Optimize Legacy vs Modernization allocation: Evolving ratio by phase (70% → 30%)
- ✅ Manage skills strategically: Hybrid model (training + recruitment), 12-month planning
- ✅ Plan critical milestones: 6 milestones, allocations by phase, risk tracking
- ✅ Mitigate risks proactively: Structured capacity planning, communication, monitoring
- ✅ Track transition KPIs: 8 key KPIs, monthly dashboards
- ✅ Invest in capacity planning tools: Optimal allocation, skills management, risk detection (ROI 400-500%)
- ✅ Communicate and involve: Transparency, clear roadmap, team feedback
Ready to optimize your digital transformation? Discover Workload, the capacity planning tool that enables you to effectively manage legacy → cloud transition, optimize allocation between legacy maintenance and modernization, plan skills, track critical milestones, and mitigate risks. 14-day free trial.
Articles connexes
Transformation digitale : Capacity Planning pour la Transition Legacy → Cloud
Étude complète sur le capacity planning pour la transformation digitale : gérer la transition legacy → cloud/modernisation, allocation entre maintenance legacy et nouveaux projets, gestion des compétences pendant la transition, planning et jalons critiques, risques et mitigation. Basé sur l'analyse de 200+ DSI françaises.
Gestion des projets IT : Priorisation et Allocation pour DSI 2026
Étude complète sur la gestion des projets IT : méthodologie de priorisation (valeur business, urgence, dépendances), allocation optimale sur projets stratégiques vs opérationnels, gestion du portefeuille de projets, éviter la surcharge des équipes, et KPIs de performance projet. Basé sur l'analyse de 190+ DSI françaises.
Optimisation des coûts IT : guide pratique 2026
Étude complète sur l'optimisation des coûts IT sans impact sur la qualité. Découvrez la répartition des coûts IT (personnel, infrastructure, outils, externalisation), comment identifier les gaspillages, les métriques et KPIs financiers, et des cas d'usage concrets. Basé sur l'analyse de 170+ DSI françaises.